5th Feb 2024 Current Affairs

1. Recommendation from the 22nd Law Commission to Maintain Criminal Defamation

Introduction:

The 22nd Law Commission has proposed the retention of criminal defamation as an offense within the new legal framework of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.

Emphasizing the significance of safeguarding an individual’s reputation, the Commission’s report draws upon Article 21 of the Constitution, which protects the right to life and personal liberty.

 

Key Recommendations: Upholding Reputation

  • Reputation, an intangible yet valuable asset developed conscientiously over a lifetime, can be instantly tarnished.
  • The jurisprudence governing criminal defamation laws is rooted in the essence of preserving one’s reputation.
  • Despite the apparent conflict with freedom of speech and expression, the Law Commission advocates a cautious approach.
  • Harmful Speech: The Commission recommends considering speech as illegal only when it intends substantial harm, and when such harm materializes.

 

What is Criminal Defamation?

Defamation involves publishing damaging content that diminishes an individual’s or entity’s reputation.

In India, defamation constitutes both a civil and criminal offense. Sections 499 and 500 of the Indian Penal Code address criminal defamation, with Section 499 defining the offense and Section 500 outlining the associated punishment.

 

Arguments in Favor of Retaining Criminal Defamation

  • Protecting Reputation: An individual’s reputation, integral to Article 21, is deemed as crucial as free speech. Balancing the right to free speech (Article 19(1)(a)) against the right to reputation (Article 21) is emphasized.

 

  • Inadequate Compensation: Civil defamation may not adequately compensate for reputation harm.

 

  • Editorial Responsibility: Editors bear responsibility for published content, with significant consequences for individuals and the nation.

 

  • Counteracting Online Defamation: Given the absence of an effective internet censorship mechanism, criminalizing defamation is considered a necessary safeguard.

 

  • State’s Interest: Criminalizing defamation aligns with the state’s compelling interest to protect citizens’ dignity and reputation.

 

Arguments against Retaining

  • Chilling Effect: Criminal defamation may have a chilling effect on free speech, with a lower threshold for prosecution than civil damages.

 

  • Media Freedom: Threats of prosecution can stifle freedom of speech and media expression crucial for vibrant democracies.

 

  • Misinterpretation of Dissent: Dissent may be misconstrued as unpalatable criticism, leading to imprisonment under Sections 499 and 500 of the IPC.

 

  • Collective Reputation: The right to reputation may not extend to collectives like the government, which can rectify reputational damage.

 

  • Redundancy: With existing civil defamation remedies, retaining criminal defamation may serve little purpose except coercion and harassment.

 

  • Global Trend: Several nations, including neighboring Sri Lanka and the UK, have decriminalized defamation.

 

  • International Perspective: The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights urges states to abolish criminal defamation due to its potential intimidation of citizens and hindrance to exposing wrongdoing.

 

Conclusion

Criminal defamation cases have been utilized to suppress investigative journalism, impeding democratic accountability.

It is imperative to prevent the misuse of criminal defamation by the state, particularly considering the advantage public servants have under the Code of Criminal Procedure. Implementing interim measures can ensure fair proceedings and prevent excessive penalties.      

 

 

2. Explanation of the Places of Worship Act and Ongoing Disputes

Introduction:

The Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991, has recently gained attention due to active civil litigation challenging the religious identity of mosques in Varanasi and Mathura, thus bringing it under the scrutiny of ongoing UPSC-related discussions.

 

Enactment of the Places of Worship Act

 

  • Background: This Act was legislated in September 1991, amid the Babri-Masjid Ram Janmabhoomi dispute, with the primary objective of addressing issues related to the status of places of worship.

 

  • Objectives: The primary objectives were to preserve the religious character of places of worship as of August 15, 1947, and prevent the conversion of these places from one denomination to another.

 

Key Provisions of the Act

 

  • Continuity of Religious Character: The Act ensures that the religious identity of a place of worship remains unchanged from its status on August 15, 1947.

 

  • Prohibition on Conversion: It prohibits the conversion of a place of worship of any religious denomination into one of a different denomination.
  • Abatement of Pending Cases: Legal proceedings initiated before August 15, 1947, regarding the conversion of a place of worship would be terminated upon the Act coming into effect, and no new proceedings could be initiated.

      

Exceptions to the Rule

  • Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites: The Act excludes ancient and historical monuments and archaeological sites protected under the Ancient Monuments and Archaeological Sites and Remains Act, 1958.

 

  • Settled Disputes: It does not apply to suits that were already settled or disposed of or to conversions by acquiescence.

 

Status of Ongoing Cases on the Gyanvapi Mosque

 

  • Current Litigation: Ongoing civil suits in Varanasi involve claims by Hindu worshippers asserting their right to worship deities within the Gyanvapi mosque premises.

 

  • Basis for Suits: The Hindu side contends that an old temple of Lord Vishweshwar existed at the center of the mosque compound, demolished by Emperor Aurangzeb in 1669.

 

  • Court Orders: Courts have ruled in favor of the position that these suits are not barred by the Places of Worship Act. The Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) conducted a survey reporting the existence of a temple before the mosque.

 

 

Implications of the Act in the Mathura Dispute

 

  • Shahi Idgah Mosque: Civil suits in Mathura pertain to the Shahi Idgah mosque near the Krishna Janmabhoomi Temple, with claims that it was built over Lord Krishna’s birthplace.

 

  • Challenging Compromise: The suits challenge a compromise reached in 1968 between Sri Krishna Janmasthan Seva Sansthan and the Shahi Idgah Trust. The Allahabad High Court has transferred all Mathura dispute suits to itself.

 

  • Act’s Applicability: Court decisions have held that the Act does not bar these suits. In the Mathura dispute, the Act is not applicable as the compromise decree predates its enactment.

 

Conclusion

 

  • The Places of Worship Act, aimed at preserving the status of places of worship, faces challenges in ongoing disputes, particularly in Varanasi and Mathura.

 

  • Courts have emphasized that the Act does not prohibit these suits, highlighting the necessity for a case-by-case examination to ascertain the religious character.

 

  • These developments underscore the complexities and legal interpretations surrounding the Act’s application in the context of evolving disputes.

3. Ergosphere: Distinctive Characteristic of Rotating Black Holes

Introduction:

Rotating black holes, scientifically referred to as Kerr black holes, exhibit a distinctive feature known as the ergosphere, differentiating them from their non-rotating counterparts.

 

Formation of Black Holes:

  • Origins: Massive stars exhaust their nuclear fuel, leading to a supernova explosion and subsequent core collapse, resulting in the birth of a black hole.

 

  • Gravitational Singularity: At the heart of a black hole lies a gravitational singularity, a point where general relativity fails to provide accurate predictions.

 

  • Event Horizon: Encompassing the singularity is the event horizon, a boundary beyond which nothing, including light, can escape—a point of irreversible entry.

 

What is Ergosphere?

  • Ergosphere Description: Beyond the event horizon, rotating black holes exhibit an additional distinct region called the ergosphere, extending outward from the singularity, forming an additional sphere around the black hole.

 

  • Name Origins: The term ‘ergosphere’ originates from the Greek word ‘ergon,’ meaning ‘work.’ It is named for the fascinating potential it holds—the extraction of matter and energy from this region.

 

Characteristics of the Ergosphere:

  • Intriguing Property: In contrast to the event horizon, objects can enter the ergosphere and potentially escape if they move at speeds less than that of light.

 

  • Acceleration Potential: Scientists have explored the concept of directing objects into the ergosphere to exploit its unique characteristics.

 

  • Within this region, objects can acquire energy and momentum, effectively “borrowing” some of the black hole’s angular momentum.

4. Financial Operations of Panchayats

Context:

Local governance entities, particularly Panchayats, grapple with challenges related to funds, functions, and functionaries, ultimately impacting their fiscal standing.

 

Background:

  • The Reserve Bank of India’s recent report sheds light on the fiscal health of Panchayati Raj Institutions, with a specific focus on the role of local taxes and fees in their overall revenue.
  • The report explores financial disparities among states, emphasizing variations in non-tax revenue and highlighting expenditure patterns.

 

Local Taxes and Fees: Modest Contribution to Panchayats’ Revenue

  • According to the report, local taxes and fees constitute only 1.1 percent of Panchayats’ total revenue.

 

  • This minimal contribution underscores a heavy dependence on alternative sources, such as grants and non-tax revenue, which collectively form a substantial portion of their financial inflows.

 

Regional Disparities: Contrasting Non-Tax Revenue Among States

  • States like Tamil Nadu, Himachal Pradesh, Maharashtra, and Telangana stand out for their higher non-tax revenue, emphasizing the diverse financial landscapes within the country.
  • These disparities underscore the necessity for a nuanced approach to comprehend and address the financial challenges faced by Panchayats.

 

Revenue Trends: Average Per Panchayat and Influencing Factors

  • The report, examining the average revenue per Panchayat over the years, notes a decline in 2022-23 attributed to reduced grants during that fiscal period.

 

  • Limited revenue sources, dominated by property taxes, fees, and fines, highlight financial constraints, exacerbated by delays in the constitution of State Finance Commissions.

 

Expenditure Patterns: Examining Spending Trends

  • Despite fluctuations, the ratio of Panchayats’ revenue expenditure to nominal Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP) remains below 0.6 percent for all states.

 

  • The report highlights a decrease in average expenditure per Panchayat from 2020-21 to 2022-23, influenced by heightened spending during the pandemic year.

 

Strategic Investments: Capital Projects and Focus Areas

  • A noteworthy portion, 6 percent in 2022-23, of Panchayats’ total expenditure is directed towards capital projects.

 

  • Investments in Panchayati Raj programs, transportation, water supply and sanitation, rural electrification, and rural housing signify a concentrated effort to address critical infrastructure needs.

 

 

 

Technological Integration: eGramSwaraj and Financial Management

  • The report underscores the increasing integration of technology in Panchayats’ financial management.

 

  • Over 2.5 lakh Panchayati Raj Institutions (PRIs) utilize the eGramSwaraj platform for accounting, with more than 2.4 lakh PRIs seamlessly integrating the eGramSwaraj-PFMS Interface for online transactions, indicating a shift towards digitization in financial operations.

 

Strengthening Financial Management and Transparency

  • As Panchayats navigate the intricate financial landscape, the report emphasizes the importance of technology-driven solutions like eGramSwaraj and the Audit Online application introduced by the Ministry of Panchayati Raj.

 

  • These initiatives aim to improve financial management, transparency, and accountability, providing a potential roadmap for the sustainable fiscal growth of Panchayati Raj Institutions.

5. Global Cancer Burden

Introduction:

The World Health Organization (WHO) released its latest estimates on February 1, 2024, revealing a substantial global surge of 20 million new cancer cases in 2022 compared to previous years.

 

Cancer Cases in India:

  • In India, 1,413,316 new cancer cases were reported in 2022, displaying a noticeable gender disparity favoring female patients.
  • Breast cancer emerged as the predominant form, constituting 13.6% of all cases, with over 26% affecting women.
  • Additionally, prevalent cancers included lip and oral cavity, cervix and uterine, lung, and esophageal cancers.

 

Global Cancer Statistics:

  • Globally, lung cancer ranked as the most common, with 2.5 million new cases, closely followed by female breast cancer with 2.3 million cases.
  • Colorectal, prostate, and stomach cancers also featured prominently among the top five most common cancers worldwide.

Impact of Socioeconomic Factors:

  • Socioeconomic factors, including tobacco usage, alcohol consumption, obesity, and air pollution, significantly contribute to the escalating global cancer burden.

 

  • Low and medium Human Development Index (HDI) countries are particularly vulnerable, experiencing higher incidence and mortality rates from cancer.

 

Policy Measures:

  • The interim budget 2024-25 in India emphasized preventive measures such as vaccinating young girls aged 9-14 against cervical cancer.
  • Addressing risk factors like smokeless tobacco consumption through effective policies and regulations is crucial for reducing the burden of oral cancer, especially in South Asian countries like India.

 

Future Projections:

  • The WHO projects a staggering 77% increase in the global cancer burden by 2050, necessitating comprehensive strategies to combat the disease.
  • This rise is expected to disproportionately affect countries with limited resources, exacerbating healthcare disparities and posing significant public health challenges.

 

Cervical Cancer:

  • Cervical cancer, ranking as the 4th most common cancer globally among women, is the 2nd most common cancer among women in India.
  • India contributes nearly 25% of global deaths from cervical cancer, with 99% of cases linked to high-risk strains of Human Papillomavirus (HPV).
  • Effective prevention strategies, including HPV vaccination and screening for precancerous lesions, can substantially reduce cervical cancer incidence.
  • Early detection and proper management significantly improve prognosis, making it one of the most treatable forms of cancer when diagnosed early.
  • India records approximately 125,000 cases and 75,000 deaths from cervical cancer each year, with specific high-risk HPV strains accounting for the majority (about 85%) of cases globally.

 

 

0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments