ANALYSING KEY CHANGES IN INDIA'S PROPOSED CRIMINAL JUSTICE REFORMS
Introduction:
- The central government has introduced three bills in Parliament in August 2023, known as the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), 2023, the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, and the Bharatiya Sakshya (BS) Bill, 2023.
- These bills aim to replace the existing Indian Penal Code, 1860, the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC), 1973, and the Indian Evidence Act, 1872.
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS):
- Registration of Cognizable Offenses:
- The BNSS includes an explicit provision for the registration of cognizable offenses in any police station, regardless of the area where the offense occurs.
- This formal inclusion may simplify the process of getting cases registered for complainants.
- Preliminary Inquiry Clause:
- The BNSS introduces a clause allowing for a preliminary inquiry to determine the existence of a prima facie case, even for cognizable offenses punishable with more than three but less than seven years of imprisonment.
- This differs from the Lalita Kumari case’s Supreme Court judgment, which mandated the registration of an FIR for cognizable offenses.
- The differentiation between cases may face constitutional scrutiny and has pros and cons, including potential for compromise or misuse.
- Arrest Provisions:
- The BNSS retains all provisions of the CrPC regarding arrest, but it does not incorporate the Supreme Court’s Arnesh Kumar judgment on justifying arrests.
- A new clause mandates prior permission from the Deputy Superintendent of Police for arrests of individuals aged over 60 or infirm for offenses punishable with less than three years of imprisonment.
- Handcuffing:
– The BNSS permits handcuffing in specific cases such as terrorism, murder, rape, and offenses against the state.
– The enabling section emphasizes that restraint should only be used as necessary to prevent escape, maintaining the Supreme Court’s guidelines on handcuffing.
At the Scene of Crime:
- Forensic Evidence Collection:
- The BNSS mandates a forensic expert’s visit to the crime scene and the collection of forensic evidence for offenses punishable with more than seven years of imprisonment.
- However, the implementation may depend on state governments’ commitment to develop forensic infrastructure.
- Use of Audio-Video Means:
- The BNSS encourages the use of audio-video means for recording investigation steps and searches, although the reliance on smartphones has limitations.
- A pilot project for videography and photography at police station levels is in progress.
- Two-Finger Test:
- Despite a ban on the two-finger test in rape cases, the BNSS does not explicitly incorporate this ban into the law.
- This could have been an opportunity to legally enforce compliance with the Union Ministry of Health and Family Welfare’s instructions.
- Disclosure of Victim’s Identity:
- The provision allowing authorization to disclose the identity of a minor victim to their next of kin may be omitted, as the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act deals exclusively with this issue.
Duration of Police Custody:
Extension of Police Custody:
- The BNSS permits an extension of the period of police custody exceeding 15 days, subject to adequate grounds and after initial detention periods.
- The discretion for this extension remains with the judiciary.
Judicial Inquiry into Suspicious Deaths:
- The BNSS expands the scope of judicial inquiry into suspicious deaths, including dowry deaths, but relaxes the mandatory recording of statements based on individuals’ willingness.
- Concerns exist about potential misuse in cases involving women and children.
Inquest Procedures:
The inclusion of videography and photography of post-mortems and the creation of spot sketches of crime scenes could improve the quality of investigations.
Conclusion:
While some proposed changes in the BNSS, BNS, and BS Bills are progressive, they are not considered groundbreaking.
It is important to remember that police stations often face challenges such as understaffing, limited mobility, inadequate training infrastructure, and poor housing facilities.
To bring about real reform, comprehensive changes in policing practices and infrastructure are necessary, rather than merely tweaking legal provisions.
G20 Summit in New Delhi: India's Global Spotlight Amidst Geopolitical Challenges
Introduction
- This weekend, the G20, a forum of the world’s largest economies dedicated to addressing global economic issues, will convene in New Delhi for its annual leaders’ summit.
- Prime Minister Narendra Modi, the host and president of this year’s G20, has used this opportunity to promote India’s global standing and bolster his domestic influence.
- Modi also sees India’s G20 presidency as a chance to position the country as a bridge between the Global South and the West, marking the culmination of India’s year-long chairmanship.
G20’s Origins and Evolution
- The G20 was established in 1999 in response to the Asian financial crisis, initially comprising 22 members and ultimately settling on 19 countries and the European Union.
- Together, these members represent around 80% of the world’s economic output.
- During the 2008 financial crisis, the G20 emerged as a vital institution facilitating cooperation among central banks and finance ministers to address global economic challenges.
Modi’s Strategic Promotion of G20 Presidency
- This campaign includes over 200 planned meetings in 56 cities, widespread posters featuring Modi and educational initiatives in schools.
- Such proactive efforts have garnered significant attention, surpassing the efforts of previous G20 chairpersons.
India’s Role as a Global Power and Bridge Builder
- India leverages its strong ties with developing nations and burgeoning partnerships with Western countries like France, Australia, and the U.S. to advocate for itself as a voice representing the Global South.
- The summit agenda prominently features issues of interest to emerging economies, such as climate financing, food security, and reforms for multilateral development banks.
- India has even proposed full G20 membership for the African Union.
Uncertainty Surrounding Summit Outcomes
- The success of the upcoming summit remains uncertain. Key questions revolve around whether consensus can be achieved on India’s priorities, including boosting global trade, advancing the green development pact (which encompasses climate finance, digital infrastructure, and renewable energy sources), and improving sustainable agriculture and food security.
- The ongoing war in Ukraine presents a significant challenge, as Russia’s actions and the responses of other nations complicate diplomacy and cooperation at the summit.
Complex Geopolitical Dynamics
- Russia’s suspension of participation in initiatives, China’s absence, and the French stance on condemning Russia’s actions in Ukraine add complexity to the summit.
- Modi will need to navigate these geopolitically sensitive issues carefully to foster cooperation and consensus in line with India’s mediation role between the Global North and South.
Conclusion
The G20 Leaders’ Summit presents India with both opportunities and risks. India must skillfully manage existing partnerships, navigate geopolitical challenges, and work towards achieving consensus on diplomatic and development agendas to solidify its declared position as a global mediator.
Success in this endeavor will strengthen India’s influence, but failure may diminish its claims on the global stage.